Very well said.FredS wrote: ↑04 Dec 2024, 06:46I think the biggest gripe most have is that he lied when he said, over and over, that he wouldn't issue a pardon. The same democrat talking heads, in the government and in the media, who told us over and over that Biden was as sharp as ever, then that Harris was a strong candidate, are now calling Biden out on this particular lie? What a total cluster f this whole circus has morphed into. Those atop the Democratic party have shown themselves to be selfish clowns who put their own interests ahead of the country and I think the party will suffer the consequences for many years. Much of the legacy media that championed Biden/Harris will never regain public trust. As Hills might say, they're all a basket of deplorable liars.sweetandsour wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 20:55Pretty far fetched IMO. Maybe the "handlers" (of the past 4 years, whoever they are) that talked Biden into running for prez dangled the "pardon the son" carrot in front of him as an incentive, I'd maybe buy that one. But otherwise, I'm willing to simply accept what the Biden family is currently saying publicly about it. I agree with Fred, it's probably the most normal and right thing he's done in the past 4 years.Del wrote: ↑03 Dec 2024, 14:21
All of the talking heads are chattering, with a spectrum of views about what this means for Biden's legacy, the Democrat Party, Trump's presidency, the nation, etc.
But here's a hot take apart from the rest, from Chuck Todd (NBC News, but speaking apart from his network)..... asserting that Joe and Jill decided to run for President for the sole and selfish reason of keeping Hunter out of jail. Sounds crazy, but it makes sense when he explains it. And it also explains Joe's lack of concern or interest in just about everything else.
60 seconds on X:
https://x.com/ChrisCillizza/status/1863762907718197263
As for legacy, Biden's was ruined anyway. Massive migrant issues, very poor economy, wokeness, thousands of fentanyl deaths, mental decline, billions to back a losing effort in Ukraine which has cost thousands of lives, Dr Jill, and on and on. He'll be remembered as one of the worst Presidents in history. Pardoning his kid is just a minor footnote in the story of his public service.
I saw that Bill Clinton was quoted as saying that he agreed with the decision, but he wished that Biden had not previously said that he would not interfere in his son's legal affairs. Semantics aside, if one states their intentions and then changes their mind, is it a lie? I remember when George Bush Sr (or whatever) was campaigning with his "read my lips, no new taxes" logo, then during his term we got new taxes, and then after he lost to Clinton, Bush himself said that it was his downfall. Some voters called him a failure for his inability to live up to his promise, but most simply called him a liar.
Anyway, and now I see that Biden is considering so-called blanket pardons, or "future pardons" if you will, for anyone that the Trump administration might go after. Where will this end?