Christian Pipe Smokers

joegoat wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 19:58 I don't see why we needed a vaccine, let alone needed to rush one into mass distribution. The plexiglass, masks, face shields, gloves, "social distancing," leaving our groceries on the porch, and shutting down businesses was supposed to stop it. Right? That's what the experts said.

Del wrote: ↑24 Nov 2022, 18:22

joegoat wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 19:58 I don't see why we needed a vaccine, let alone needed to rush one into mass distribution. The plexiglass, masks, face shields, gloves, "social distancing," leaving our groceries on the porch, and shutting down businesses was supposed to stop it. Right? That's what the experts said.

As cynically as I can tell --

The chaos of the masks (etc) and closing businesses, schools & churches had one purpose.... same as the riots and protests (which were immune to the virus, so they were allowed to happen). That purpose was to remove Donald Trump from the White House.

The vaccines had a different purpose. They were to enrich the Big Pharma executives, as well as Fauci & Friends. This was a big "thank you" for their secret contributions and insider stock tips.

SlowToke wrote: ↑24 Nov 2022, 19:39

Del wrote: ↑24 Nov 2022, 18:22

joegoat wrote: ↑22 Nov 2022, 19:58 I don't see why we needed a vaccine, let alone needed to rush one into mass distribution. The plexiglass, masks, face shields, gloves, "social distancing," leaving our groceries on the porch, and shutting down businesses was supposed to stop it. Right? That's what the experts said.

As cynically as I can tell --

The chaos of the masks (etc) and closing businesses, schools & churches had one purpose.... same as the riots and protests (which were immune to the virus, so they were allowed to happen). That purpose was to remove Donald Trump from the White House.

The vaccines had a different purpose. They were to enrich the Big Pharma executives, as well as Fauci & Friends. This was a big "thank you" for their secret contributions and insider stock tips.

Maybe. Or maybe even more nefarious than that. If you're a billionaire global elitist group with a ton of power and you truly believe that the earth is overpopulated and that overpopulation is destroying the earth and it's (and your) demise is inevitable, you might think a reasonable and altruistic solution would be to artificially decrease the world population by getting rid of some undesirables. But, you couldn't do it overtly. Of course, you might fund the development of a virus and make it just deadly enough to kill off the less desirable and useful people like the elderly and obese who just cost us all money anyway but not deadly enough to wipe out the entire planet. You could then conspire with a communist country whose government has no qualms enacting evils on its people to "accidentally" allow that virus to escape a lab with incredibly strict procedures and protocols to prevent such things from ever happening. Then you could convince the population to eliminate themselves out of fear by taking an "experimental" injection with little to no evidence of efficacy or safety all while having your media propaganda machine instill fear in the people and convince everyone that this experimental injection is "completely safe and effective" even though there has never been any drug or vaccine ever to be "completely safe and effective." You could then convince the same people to take multiple injections when they don't work and even shows evidence that it may be harming people to which you just say, "no it's not" and they will believe you. You could call this "experimental injection" a vaccine even though it isn't and you could make billions of dollars off of it. You could have the media propagandist demonize anyone who questions said "vaccine" or other control measures you put in place without a bit of evidence of efficacy or science and even convince employers to fire those people and shame them or bully them into submission against their will. I dunno. Maybe. Probably.