Seems to me like yer sayin' that the problem is not so much with Doctrinal Development but, rather, with the fact that yer not the Pope. IOW, had doctrine developed according to yer druthers, then 'twould all be cromulent.mcommini wrote: ↑03 Jan 2024, 13:05 Look, Wos, at the end of the day it doesn't matter what the Orthodox understand or don't understand about Doctrinal Development. You can assemble all your most gifted Byzantinists and craft a document that explains Doctrinal Development in terms that would make St John Chrysostom weep at the truth and beauty of the contents inside. But the debate will never truly be about whether doctrine can develop, but about the developments themselves. And that is the problem.
[…]
You Heard It Here First
- Wosbald
- Door Greeter
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: 15 Nov 2022, 10:50
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
You Heard It Here First
+JMJ+
- Del
- Deacon
- Posts: 3446
- Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 22:08
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 295 times
- Been thanked: 502 times
You Heard It Here First
10 Words The Simpsons Made Famous
3. Cromulent
Cromulent is a word created by Simpsons writer David X. Cohen, who would go on to co-develop Futurama with Matt Groening. Cohen came up with the word for the season seven episode "Lisa the Iconoclast," where Ms. Hoover tells Mrs. Krabappel that the slightly less fictitious "embiggen" is a "perfectly cromulent" word.
Cromulent is now listed in Webster's New Millennium Dictionary of English, and its dictionary.com listing says that cromulent is an adjective meaning "fine" or "acceptable."
-
- Sunday School Teacher
- Posts: 138
- Joined: 12 Jul 2022, 15:56
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
You Heard It Here First
My own personal druthers have little to do with it. The druthers of the Orthodox saints have much.Wosbald wrote: ↑04 Jan 2024, 08:25 +JMJ+
Seems to me like yer sayin' that the problem is not so much with Doctrinal Development but, rather, with the fact that yer not the Pope. IOW, had doctrine developed according to yer druthers, then 'twould all be cromulent.mcommini wrote: ↑03 Jan 2024, 13:05 Look, Wos, at the end of the day it doesn't matter what the Orthodox understand or don't understand about Doctrinal Development. You can assemble all your most gifted Byzantinists and craft a document that explains Doctrinal Development in terms that would make St John Chrysostom weep at the truth and beauty of the contents inside. But the debate will never truly be about whether doctrine can develop, but about the developments themselves. And that is the problem.
[…]
But yes, if your doctrines had developed in accordance with the Orthodox faith, it would not only be cromulent, we'd be carrying the Pope through the streets with much fanfare shouting "this man speaks with the voice of Peter!" Such a thing would have embiggened us all.