You Heard It Here First

For the thinkers, theologians, philospophers.
User avatar
Wosbald
Door Greeter
Door Greeter
Posts: 1041
Joined: 15 Nov 2022, 10:50
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 59 times

You Heard It Here First

Post by Wosbald »

+JMJ+
mcommini wrote: 03 Jan 2024, 13:05 Look, Wos, at the end of the day it doesn't matter what the Orthodox understand or don't understand about Doctrinal Development. You can assemble all your most gifted Byzantinists and craft a document that explains Doctrinal Development in terms that would make St John Chrysostom weep at the truth and beauty of the contents inside. But the debate will never truly be about whether doctrine can develop, but about the developments themselves. And that is the problem.

[…]
Seems to me like yer sayin' that the problem is not so much with Doctrinal Development but, rather, with the fact that yer not the Pope. IOW, had doctrine developed according to yer druthers, then 'twould all be cromulent.

:confusion-shrug:


Image
User avatar
Del
Usher
Usher
Posts: 2825
Joined: 11 Apr 2022, 22:08
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 242 times
Been thanked: 392 times

You Heard It Here First

Post by Del »

10 Words The Simpsons Made Famous
3. Cromulent

Cromulent is a word created by Simpsons writer David X. Cohen, who would go on to co-develop Futurama with Matt Groening. Cohen came up with the word for the season seven episode "Lisa the Iconoclast," where Ms. Hoover tells Mrs. Krabappel that the slightly less fictitious "embiggen" is a "perfectly cromulent" word.

Cromulent is now listed in Webster's New Millennium Dictionary of English, and its dictionary.com listing says that cromulent is an adjective meaning "fine" or "acceptable."
mcommini
Sunday School Teacher
Sunday School Teacher
Posts: 138
Joined: 12 Jul 2022, 15:56
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 41 times

You Heard It Here First

Post by mcommini »

Wosbald wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 08:25 +JMJ+
mcommini wrote: 03 Jan 2024, 13:05 Look, Wos, at the end of the day it doesn't matter what the Orthodox understand or don't understand about Doctrinal Development. You can assemble all your most gifted Byzantinists and craft a document that explains Doctrinal Development in terms that would make St John Chrysostom weep at the truth and beauty of the contents inside. But the debate will never truly be about whether doctrine can develop, but about the developments themselves. And that is the problem.

[…]
Seems to me like yer sayin' that the problem is not so much with Doctrinal Development but, rather, with the fact that yer not the Pope. IOW, had doctrine developed according to yer druthers, then 'twould all be cromulent.

:confusion-shrug:
My own personal druthers have little to do with it. The druthers of the Orthodox saints have much.

But yes, if your doctrines had developed in accordance with the Orthodox faith, it would not only be cromulent, we'd be carrying the Pope through the streets with much fanfare shouting "this man speaks with the voice of Peter!" Such a thing would have embiggened us all.
Post Reply